After looking at all of the fun things to do in this Quest, I still wonder what all of this is about. Yes, the things are fun: slideroll could really be useful for sharing photos.
Evite is cute, but I don't think I would use it, or appreciate getting an email invitation.
Dogster and Catser are interesting, but again, I would have no need to use it. Why would I want millions of people to see my pets?
43 things: I don't really care what strangers want to do, or to let strangers know what I want to do with my life.
Onesentence is sort of cute, but again, what is the point? I must be missing something.
Artpad could be useful. I would like it to sent pictures to my grandson.
The Generator blog is for people who enjoy blogging, I guess.
Anyway, all in all, I don't see what the use to libraries would be except maybe for slideroll.
It's good though that I've learned about these things, because I would never come across them on my own.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Quest 9 Wikiwikiwiki
I've used Wikipedia personally a number of times. It's easy to read, and gives lots of facts. I know it's not necessarily accurate. Sometimes I've used it to find dates, or names, and then verified them from legitimate sources. I would not use it at the reference desk, or recommend it to any patrons. I've never found anything that I felt should be edited.
I liked the library wikis. The St. Joseph wiki had lots of subject headings to choose from. The wiki was set up to be edited by librarians only.
The Library Success wiki looked just like wikipedia. Some of the headings had little or nothing under them, but it was simple to use.
I really liked the book lovers wiki. This is something that I think would be very useful to patrons. Keep in mind that a lot of older patrons do not want to use computers, so having a book lovers wiki would leave out a number of patrons.
The Bull Run wiki is a work in progress. I was surprised to see that it's maintained by a patron, and not anyone from the library. I did not like the way it was set up.
I liked the SCLA wiki- there were some good links on it to library blogs. I noticed that some wikis have been subject to vandalism, so emails must be registered in order to edit.
I liked the library wikis. The St. Joseph wiki had lots of subject headings to choose from. The wiki was set up to be edited by librarians only.
The Library Success wiki looked just like wikipedia. Some of the headings had little or nothing under them, but it was simple to use.
I really liked the book lovers wiki. This is something that I think would be very useful to patrons. Keep in mind that a lot of older patrons do not want to use computers, so having a book lovers wiki would leave out a number of patrons.
The Bull Run wiki is a work in progress. I was surprised to see that it's maintained by a patron, and not anyone from the library. I did not like the way it was set up.
I liked the SCLA wiki- there were some good links on it to library blogs. I noticed that some wikis have been subject to vandalism, so emails must be registered in order to edit.
Friday, October 5, 2007
Quest #8
I looked and browsed through all of the sites in the Discovery Exercise.
I suppose I liked Friendster the most. It seemed more down to earth, with not too many weirdos.
bebo seemed sort of strange with users using lots of abbreviations such as "ne" for "any". I looked at a couple of videos, and thought they were sort of amateurish and boring. Also I didn't find much under the Authors that was interesting.
linkedin is interesting. I did not open an account with any of these, but I did find 100 + people from my university on linkedin.
facebook seems pretty straightforward.
I looked at the Myspace tech trek 2.0- nice!
As for the videos, it's hard to tell if anything objectionable is going to be in them until you start viewing them. Also I did not hear any good music.
I suppose I liked Friendster the most. It seemed more down to earth, with not too many weirdos.
bebo seemed sort of strange with users using lots of abbreviations such as "ne" for "any". I looked at a couple of videos, and thought they were sort of amateurish and boring. Also I didn't find much under the Authors that was interesting.
linkedin is interesting. I did not open an account with any of these, but I did find 100 + people from my university on linkedin.
facebook seems pretty straightforward.
I looked at the Myspace tech trek 2.0- nice!
As for the videos, it's hard to tell if anything objectionable is going to be in them until you start viewing them. Also I did not hear any good music.
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
Quest #8 Social Networking
I have read several of the linked articles. I'm having a little trouble understanding how people find library MYSPACE pages by chance. It seems that a library would need lots of publicity for blogs and networking pages to be worthwhile. Do these sites encourage reading? If it's getting people to talk about books, then that's a good thing. Also I understand teens must be 14 to get accounts. How is the age checked? What teen would say they're 12 if they want to get a page?
My children have MYSPACE pages (they're adults). They like them because they've been able to reconnect with long lost friends from early school years. They might never have found some of these people.
One of the articles really downplayed the incidences of sexual predators on these sites. Even if it is a small percentage, it seems it's still something to consider.
Why not talk to people in person that you know, and meet new people that way? Are people so lonely that they have to meet people on a computer?
My children have MYSPACE pages (they're adults). They like them because they've been able to reconnect with long lost friends from early school years. They might never have found some of these people.
One of the articles really downplayed the incidences of sexual predators on these sites. Even if it is a small percentage, it seems it's still something to consider.
Why not talk to people in person that you know, and meet new people that way? Are people so lonely that they have to meet people on a computer?
Friday, September 28, 2007
Quest 6 Technorati
I used the Advanced Search for Library 2.0. I found 31,408 using the keyword search. I tried it with and without quotation marks. It separated the words "library" and "2.0"
For the tags I found 6,296 blog posts. I had the best results with the Blog Directory Search. Even though only 249 blogs came up, they seemed more relevant. I tried other search words in the blog directory, and had much better results than using the initial search or the tag or keyword searches.
I still don't find it interesting to read other people's blogs, and I'm at a loss as to how it could be useful in my job.
Yes, useful to disperse information, but not to find it. After all, most blogs I've read are people's opinions.
For the tags I found 6,296 blog posts. I had the best results with the Blog Directory Search. Even though only 249 blogs came up, they seemed more relevant. I tried other search words in the blog directory, and had much better results than using the initial search or the tag or keyword searches.
I still don't find it interesting to read other people's blogs, and I'm at a loss as to how it could be useful in my job.
Yes, useful to disperse information, but not to find it. After all, most blogs I've read are people's opinions.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Flickr- Quest 7 continued
Well, I got another co-worker to help me, and it worked. I would have had no idea how to get the link in without her help. Now I'll try another one. Here is a link to a photo of Charleston that I really like.
Click here
Click here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)